Pop quiz: What happens towards a company’s stock whenever its leader results in the dock?

Well, let’s look at history. Remember ex- Tyco CEO Dennis Kozlowski, he of the $6,000 shower window curtain, who more than a 10 years ago was guilty for fraud, larceny and various crimes? Or consider Jeff Skilling, of similar antique, whose handling involving Enron ended with his demo and conviction about felony charges?

In each cases, scandal led to in a free fall stock prices, and corporate chapter 13. So the answer to this unique quiz is shateringly obvious, right?

Well, perhaps not.

Consider the curious case of Samsung Group and its leader, Lee Jae-yong, who’s at the centre with the items some are labelling South Korea’s trial of the century.

It begins Thursday in Seoul. The 48-year-old vice-chairman with Samsung stands charged with giving or promising a close associate connected with Korean President Car park Geun-hye the equivalent of about $50 trillion, in return for political favors. Park, if you’ll recall, was impeached last 12 amid a installing corruption scandal that has sparked public outrage; the lady may well face criminal charges of her this week.

Lee hasn’t been convicted of anything, and has vowed to clear his brand. Still, what would you anticipate to happen to the gives of Samsung’s many element companies? Disaster, perfect?

Wrong. Lee was charged on Feb. 19. Since then, shares in Samsung Electronics, the actual conglomerate’s flagship unit and also Korea’s largest publicly traded company, are up much more than six per cent. The actual stock is currently exchanging on the Korea Change above two million picked up (about $2,335) – an all-time high. (It also trading as a global depositary sales receipt on the London Return, and is a major major component of Korea catalog funds and of certain emerging market dollars.)

That would be remarkable plenty of, but alleged malfeasance while in the executive offices is just not Samsung’s only challenge. Personally, there was that very little problem of the expanding Galaxy Note 7’s not too long ago, which forced the provider to recall many phones and cost them billions of dollars. These days, documents released by WikiLeaks suggest that the Central intelligence agency might have been spying on folks through Straight talk samsung Smart TV sets.

None of the has mattered much to be able to investors, apparently. Absolutely sure, the stock had taken a dip after the recall, but during the last three months, Samsung Technology is up 13 percent. Over the past 12 months, it’s up 68 percent.

What gives? Well, section of the reason for the run-up would be that the company just is apparently run so darned well. Take the Be aware 7 issue: the idea acted quickly about the recall, its command made bows and i’m sorry, and the world shifted. Meanwhile, its parts business, which provides ingredients for other companies’ smartphones on the market (including Apple’s), is going gangbusters. Inside January, Samsung Gadgets recorded profit continuing development of 20 per cent for fiscal 2016, despite the mobile blow-up.

So that’s one reason. Other might have to do with your trial itself, which is taking place in the context of something like a popular revolt in opposition to business as usual in South Korea.

A bit of record: In the 1960s, this military government inspired the development of family-run conglomerates by stock trading market protections and also guaranteed loans for investment, export-heavy industrial manufacturing and, eventually, politics support. The ending system, called chaebol (virtually “rich clan”), was instrumental from the country’s renaissance following the Korean War.

But there was a downside: a large concentration both of economic activity and of wealth, fuelling well-known resentment. Today, something such as 80 per cent regarding Korea’s economy is operated by a handful of family-run conglomerates, that operate in everything from technology and automobiles to help insurance and manner.

The individual units’ ownership set ups are often convoluted, as you would expect, as ruling people cobble together control through the combination of direct possession, nonvoting shares and cross-ownership amongst businesses and allied organizations. Samsung Party is the biggest of the chaebol, whose various activities comprise more than 10 per cent of Korea’s GDP. In particular, among Samsung Electronics’ prevalent stockholders of record usually are Samsung Corp., Samsung Life cover and Samsung Open fire & Marine Insurance, plus the Samsung Foundation of Customs and the Samsung Well being Foundation.

Not surprisingly, given the close ties among related companies, and somewhere between government and chaebol, it has often built South Korea the target associated with criticism, from together within and with no, on the grounds of poor corporate governance and wide-spread corruption. Market-watchers have lengthy talked about a “Korea discount” towards the nation’s publicly traded firms.

To market optimists, then, Lee’s legalised woes are a sign that things can be about to change: his or her trial, to them, will be a trial for the entire chaebol program, whose demise, among other things, would be to the benefit of share valuations.

Well, maybe. The story of chaebol-related prosecutions is not really exactly favourable : Lee’s father, who ceded capacity to his son from heart attack in 2016, was initially twice convicted of levy evasion and bribery, but under no circumstances jailed. And even when there were some substantial corporate reform software, it would be neither effortless nor smooth, offered how intrinsic this chaebol system is to the Mandarin chinese economy. Disrupting it all too much, or too rapidly, could provide the community with a new defining case in point for the phrase “too large to fail.”

So most likely the Korea optimists are involved in wishful thinking. Or maybe correctly careful what they choose to. For now, Samsung individuals aren’t complaining.